The life is the capability to act and behave, by a body.
The starting point, to think of life may be study of life started on earth. It is believed that, the first live creature was created in sea. Many molecules in oceon, were accidentally come together under lightening. etc, and the first micro organism was created. This organism can perform basic characteristic of life. It was unicellular (having one cell. Cell is the basic functioning unit of life, which has growth and reproducability.) The molecules which constitute a cell have a tendancy to be together, perform spontaneous action-reactions, which cause different stages, in its life time. A siezure of life is stopping of these action-reactions. The spontaneous chain of actions performed by an object, makes it grow, reproduce and then it attains a stage where, growth stops. later, at some other point of time, the functionaing itself stops. This constitutes a life cycle.
The reproduction results in offspring, which has a similar life cycle. This continuation is a characteristic of life, there is a way in which every species has got mechanism to continue its existance across the generations. The similarity of life cycle is another characteristic of life. The lifecycle of the organism will be similar in all generations. One important characteristics of life is perseverance for existance. Any danger to its existance is resisted by life furiously. A stone would resist when somebody tried to break it by its mere material strength. A live organism, can perform many variery of actions, when there is a danger.
Upto now, with whatever exploration that has been done by human race, they have not yet found any other planet where life can exist. That means, not all situations give rise to life. Particular conditions can only give rise to existance of life. But, there may be another possibility. There may be life in our explored part of universe, where life exists, still, with present ability of ours we are not able to find it. Or, that which doesnt fit into our definition of life.
What I finally feel is life is a manifestation of energy. A way in which energy shows its presence. But, this way of expressing itself, is of special kind, where there is a practice and characteristic associated with material.
There might be a singular thing with each life. The lifespan sensed by each of creature may be same. Consider, a butterfly which hardly lives for a day and an elephant which live for years. A butterfly will experience birth, growth and death in a small span of time. But, an elepant take years to pass through those stages. It may be vaguely concluded that, the amount of life span felt by each type of live creature will be same. A minute of butterfly life is equivalent to a year of human life.
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Science and humanity
Dear readers, today, I would like to explain about the scientific inventions.
Basically, science has been an account of deductions based on something that has been observed. Regorous scientific researches had been used to conceptualize theories of what is not seen. And these concepts have been undergoing changes and being debated widely. Just take an example of concepts about light. Light was thought to be of wave form first, later it was supposed to be composed of descrete particles. They are argued to be of cirtain form, based on observations and deductions of different scientists. Presently, there are electronic devices which are built based on the theory of light, being wave. Also there are other electronic devices, which are based on light, taken to be collection of particles. So, it proves light being both wave as well as collection of particles? No, both the theories must be wrong. There must be some form, which is not yet completely understood, which exhibits characteristics of both wave and particles. What we know presently is a partial truth about light.
Great scientists have taken much pain to discover the basic truth of universe and about us. But they have known everything partially. Our scientists today still say that they are very close to the truth. But, looking at the uncirtainity about each of the theories of science, I feel, knowing truth through science seems to be a never ending process. Because, science always asks for reasons behind the truth. Truth by itself is not its destination. But, there have been great ease of life brought to us through scientific discoveries. We have been using science to enable ourelves to do more daily work.
Our culture has been affected by science. An advance in science is gradually transformed into a percieved advantage in day to day life through technology. And the technology gradually is affecting our way of life. Naturally, the new ways of life, are not easily understandable. We say sceince and technology has brought changes in our lives. Yes, they have been bringing considerable changes in our day to day life.
Are our values of life being affected. We have been valueing many qualitites of ours. Are they being affected by all these technological advances? I dont think so. But, one thing which is obvious is that, the manifestation of voilation of these values has become more distructive and effective. But, finally we need to trust. May be humanity is the one which will be a value for ever. But what exactly composes humanity? Humanity is respect for life. The world will shelter any form of life, with respect, without posing any condition. Having life is the only condition to get freedom to live. This is humanity. If all of us are enough broadminded and are able to show humanity, may be that should be the final motto of life in totality, that is the goal of civilization also.
Here we need to note one thing, science actually is not spoiling humanity. It is its usage that is done for both constuctive and distructive purposes. It is natural for any newly invented thing to be used both the ways. Any man is just like a kid, whenever new things come on way, he wants to experiment.
One obvious thing is any deviation from natural living cannot be as comfort giving as any other way fo leading life. A natural life is obviously ideal, since the ruler is still the nature, which has a power to balance, without descrimination to any species or region. Once man has taken the power, either it is his responsibility to maintain that balance. If he doesn't maintain, nature again plays a role to maintain it, but this process can be more destructive in effect, the amount of destruction depends on the amount of imbalance created by human race.
Knowing the limits of science by now, as we have limited access to observables (example, we can create some theories about atoms molecules, prove them by matching thier predictions and actual observations, but actually we have never proved thier existance. We actually prove predictions of theories not theories themselves. We then lead our way to thoeries through cause effect logic, which is prone to errors.), we are not in a position to access the rule or whatever, which governs the whole universe. The by products of great scientific discoveries have increased our potential to sustain as well as destroy ourselves. It would not be a wise decision to go for science if there is another option (for getting answers to questions about this universe and ourselves).
Basically, science has been an account of deductions based on something that has been observed. Regorous scientific researches had been used to conceptualize theories of what is not seen. And these concepts have been undergoing changes and being debated widely. Just take an example of concepts about light. Light was thought to be of wave form first, later it was supposed to be composed of descrete particles. They are argued to be of cirtain form, based on observations and deductions of different scientists. Presently, there are electronic devices which are built based on the theory of light, being wave. Also there are other electronic devices, which are based on light, taken to be collection of particles. So, it proves light being both wave as well as collection of particles? No, both the theories must be wrong. There must be some form, which is not yet completely understood, which exhibits characteristics of both wave and particles. What we know presently is a partial truth about light.
Great scientists have taken much pain to discover the basic truth of universe and about us. But they have known everything partially. Our scientists today still say that they are very close to the truth. But, looking at the uncirtainity about each of the theories of science, I feel, knowing truth through science seems to be a never ending process. Because, science always asks for reasons behind the truth. Truth by itself is not its destination. But, there have been great ease of life brought to us through scientific discoveries. We have been using science to enable ourelves to do more daily work.
Our culture has been affected by science. An advance in science is gradually transformed into a percieved advantage in day to day life through technology. And the technology gradually is affecting our way of life. Naturally, the new ways of life, are not easily understandable. We say sceince and technology has brought changes in our lives. Yes, they have been bringing considerable changes in our day to day life.
Are our values of life being affected. We have been valueing many qualitites of ours. Are they being affected by all these technological advances? I dont think so. But, one thing which is obvious is that, the manifestation of voilation of these values has become more distructive and effective. But, finally we need to trust. May be humanity is the one which will be a value for ever. But what exactly composes humanity? Humanity is respect for life. The world will shelter any form of life, with respect, without posing any condition. Having life is the only condition to get freedom to live. This is humanity. If all of us are enough broadminded and are able to show humanity, may be that should be the final motto of life in totality, that is the goal of civilization also.
Here we need to note one thing, science actually is not spoiling humanity. It is its usage that is done for both constuctive and distructive purposes. It is natural for any newly invented thing to be used both the ways. Any man is just like a kid, whenever new things come on way, he wants to experiment.
One obvious thing is any deviation from natural living cannot be as comfort giving as any other way fo leading life. A natural life is obviously ideal, since the ruler is still the nature, which has a power to balance, without descrimination to any species or region. Once man has taken the power, either it is his responsibility to maintain that balance. If he doesn't maintain, nature again plays a role to maintain it, but this process can be more destructive in effect, the amount of destruction depends on the amount of imbalance created by human race.
Knowing the limits of science by now, as we have limited access to observables (example, we can create some theories about atoms molecules, prove them by matching thier predictions and actual observations, but actually we have never proved thier existance. We actually prove predictions of theories not theories themselves. We then lead our way to thoeries through cause effect logic, which is prone to errors.), we are not in a position to access the rule or whatever, which governs the whole universe. The by products of great scientific discoveries have increased our potential to sustain as well as destroy ourselves. It would not be a wise decision to go for science if there is another option (for getting answers to questions about this universe and ourselves).
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
what do we want?
Dear readers, today I would like to comment on how our desires get misinterpreted by ourselves many times.
The excellence in any field comes from dedicated effort, as we know. How somebody gets this dedication? Dedication comes when someone is clear about what he/she wants and give enough priority to what exactly they want. One who is clear about what he/she wants, it is possible to put pin pointed effort, as to achieve wanted things. There is only success in life always, if following concept is understood clearly.
What exactly we want, is most of the times wrongly manifested by ourselves. Our perception of what we want, is so obscure, many a times. We never realize, what actually we want to be in life. Or we build psuedo(falsehoods)'s around what we want and proceed in the direction of psuedo's. Result is, we finally end up getting we dont want. In fact, this also has an intricate explaination. When someone says he/she didnot get what he/she wanted, if you examine closely, they didn't want to get succeeded in thier missions. They actually wanted to repent after, not getting "so called" wanted things. Why this happens? You may really wonder, why somebody would like to fail? There are hidden reasons. They didn't want to succeed because, in a remote corner of thier mind, they feel they are not worth it, or thier intention basically is to hear somebody praising them, as a looser but still abler than winners. Many people dont want to succeed because, they have fear that, after success, they would no longer be themselves as they are now. In those cases, they actually want to maintain an identity than getting success. So many. Mind is too smart and excellent in creating pranks for life.
Let me give an example. One of my friends wanted to become a great cricket player. He, practiced hard, and got into good teams around our locality. Got good name in cricket. It went upto some years. In those years he got good recognition as a player. Later his interest suddenly started fading. He would not go to practices. His performance got worse, if he was given out, many times he would get angry etc. Gradually he, was thrown out of good teams, for whom he was playing in past years. But, why this happened nobody knew. I had been a silent spectator for his ups and downs and some day had a discussion on what he actually wanted, and finally it turned out that, actually he wanted to get recognized. As he got recognized, his actual want of being recognized has been already satisfied. Otherwise, basically, he is not interested in cricket. So, this is how a pseudo builds up so much that, one forgets his/her actual wants.
So, final question is, should we repent? I really wonder when somebody complains that he/she didnot get what he/she wanted. Or rather, usually I start interrogating what exactly he/she wanted, and why he/she is pretending to be not getting the ones they wanted. This is a common problem, and may be if, this problem doesnot exist, life also may sieze to exist.
Finally, what I want to convey is that, we never need to worry about, what we are now. We actually wanted to exist like this due to some reasons and desires at some remote corner of our self. Thats why every one of us is here like this. Only thing we need to concentrate on, is, to be truthful to ourselves, and head towards what exactly we want, so that life becomes much simpler. And the other is, we can be useful to make others realize how happy and lucky they are and they have been.
The excellence in any field comes from dedicated effort, as we know. How somebody gets this dedication? Dedication comes when someone is clear about what he/she wants and give enough priority to what exactly they want. One who is clear about what he/she wants, it is possible to put pin pointed effort, as to achieve wanted things. There is only success in life always, if following concept is understood clearly.
What exactly we want, is most of the times wrongly manifested by ourselves. Our perception of what we want, is so obscure, many a times. We never realize, what actually we want to be in life. Or we build psuedo(falsehoods)'s around what we want and proceed in the direction of psuedo's. Result is, we finally end up getting we dont want. In fact, this also has an intricate explaination. When someone says he/she didnot get what he/she wanted, if you examine closely, they didn't want to get succeeded in thier missions. They actually wanted to repent after, not getting "so called" wanted things. Why this happens? You may really wonder, why somebody would like to fail? There are hidden reasons. They didn't want to succeed because, in a remote corner of thier mind, they feel they are not worth it, or thier intention basically is to hear somebody praising them, as a looser but still abler than winners. Many people dont want to succeed because, they have fear that, after success, they would no longer be themselves as they are now. In those cases, they actually want to maintain an identity than getting success. So many. Mind is too smart and excellent in creating pranks for life.
Let me give an example. One of my friends wanted to become a great cricket player. He, practiced hard, and got into good teams around our locality. Got good name in cricket. It went upto some years. In those years he got good recognition as a player. Later his interest suddenly started fading. He would not go to practices. His performance got worse, if he was given out, many times he would get angry etc. Gradually he, was thrown out of good teams, for whom he was playing in past years. But, why this happened nobody knew. I had been a silent spectator for his ups and downs and some day had a discussion on what he actually wanted, and finally it turned out that, actually he wanted to get recognized. As he got recognized, his actual want of being recognized has been already satisfied. Otherwise, basically, he is not interested in cricket. So, this is how a pseudo builds up so much that, one forgets his/her actual wants.
So, final question is, should we repent? I really wonder when somebody complains that he/she didnot get what he/she wanted. Or rather, usually I start interrogating what exactly he/she wanted, and why he/she is pretending to be not getting the ones they wanted. This is a common problem, and may be if, this problem doesnot exist, life also may sieze to exist.
Finally, what I want to convey is that, we never need to worry about, what we are now. We actually wanted to exist like this due to some reasons and desires at some remote corner of our self. Thats why every one of us is here like this. Only thing we need to concentrate on, is, to be truthful to ourselves, and head towards what exactly we want, so that life becomes much simpler. And the other is, we can be useful to make others realize how happy and lucky they are and they have been.
Friday, August 17, 2007
Let me answer some of them
As promised, I am back on this topic, dear readers.
One category is yet to be put into unknown and unseen.
THE MICRO:
We see materials around us. What are they composed of. The minuteness of the elements, it is composed of, canot be seen. What is there in each form of each matter? Everything is supposed to contain basically one or several of 107 discovered elements. Are these the only elements in the whole universe? How the variation of property comes from in each material? What are atoms of these molecules composed of?
Another basic question appears, how is life formed out of these micros? How only some materials behave to be live? What is life? Is the life just an effort of atoms or molecules to exist cohesively?
Ok, enough with the questions, I feel. Let me try to answer atleast soem of these questions.
UNIVERSE:
I will try to put my knowledge of universe. In present concepts stars, planets, moons, activities and life of these objects have been predicted. One of the moons of Saturn was assumed to have life. Pluto is predicted to be a planet; later argument went on to say it is not. There had been much debate on what is the position of Sun in Milky Way. There has been discussion on how sun moves in Milky Way. There have been many elaborations on how black holes get formed and how they suck, all which it around it. There have been proofs and disproofs for the scientific base on which their functioning is elaborated. Nova and supernova have been explained, as to how they happen. In which stage they happen, and what is the condition for supernova to happen in the life of star. If I start writing answers to these questions it will be very long and I would be doing nothing more than copying from other sources.
But, finally, where these entire R&D will end, how definitive will we be after finding so many things? If we are not definitive after these entire R&D what else is the use? Shouldn’t we pursue in direction which is more evident, definitive in terms of results? Aren’t we missing something in the course of this research? How logical is it to put our potential in this direction?
OTHER CULTURES:
There is wide variety in the culture of us all. There is popular western culture, which is much open-minded. People like to be free, and more of women equality. Having variety of hobbies, most enjoying people are in this culture. There is Eastern culture, where discipline of life is of higher priority, where culture has much to do with religion, each person tightly bond to family. Then there is culture of Middle East. There are many. Simply put together, a deviation from natural way of living is culture and the difference between cultures depends on how they have deviated from natural life. It includes the difference in habitat, talking, food habit, free time habits, life management, and management of emotions.
GOD AND SPIRITS:
How is God? This question is answered in several different ways, according to different beliefs. Though we have not seen Him, we believe Him. It’s the belief that makes us comfortable, particularly in difficult situations. This example may ease definition of God. God is helping. Whatever helps in our life, we never call it God. But we ask God to help. So, God is complementary of what supports us directly. Or, we dont want to define God within any limits. When we see something, which exhibits a characteristic of God, we define it. So, it will sieze to be a part of God. Finally, we dont want to define God, probably because, we dont want to loose belief in unbound capacity of God.
What about spirits and life after death? First we need to define life before death. Presently, I will take your excuse and write it in next posts.
Having answered some questions of my earlier post, I would like to answer an obvious question of yours. After discussing about all these things what are we heading towards? Are we going for some conclusion? Answer is yes, but I don’t want to fill you with the conclusion now only. I want the readers to be unbiased, give objective feedbacks until the end. Let me finish today’s post with this. I will come again. Bye.
One category is yet to be put into unknown and unseen.
THE MICRO:
We see materials around us. What are they composed of. The minuteness of the elements, it is composed of, canot be seen. What is there in each form of each matter? Everything is supposed to contain basically one or several of 107 discovered elements. Are these the only elements in the whole universe? How the variation of property comes from in each material? What are atoms of these molecules composed of?
Another basic question appears, how is life formed out of these micros? How only some materials behave to be live? What is life? Is the life just an effort of atoms or molecules to exist cohesively?
Ok, enough with the questions, I feel. Let me try to answer atleast soem of these questions.
UNIVERSE:
I will try to put my knowledge of universe. In present concepts stars, planets, moons, activities and life of these objects have been predicted. One of the moons of Saturn was assumed to have life. Pluto is predicted to be a planet; later argument went on to say it is not. There had been much debate on what is the position of Sun in Milky Way. There has been discussion on how sun moves in Milky Way. There have been many elaborations on how black holes get formed and how they suck, all which it around it. There have been proofs and disproofs for the scientific base on which their functioning is elaborated. Nova and supernova have been explained, as to how they happen. In which stage they happen, and what is the condition for supernova to happen in the life of star. If I start writing answers to these questions it will be very long and I would be doing nothing more than copying from other sources.
But, finally, where these entire R&D will end, how definitive will we be after finding so many things? If we are not definitive after these entire R&D what else is the use? Shouldn’t we pursue in direction which is more evident, definitive in terms of results? Aren’t we missing something in the course of this research? How logical is it to put our potential in this direction?
OTHER CULTURES:
There is wide variety in the culture of us all. There is popular western culture, which is much open-minded. People like to be free, and more of women equality. Having variety of hobbies, most enjoying people are in this culture. There is Eastern culture, where discipline of life is of higher priority, where culture has much to do with religion, each person tightly bond to family. Then there is culture of Middle East. There are many. Simply put together, a deviation from natural way of living is culture and the difference between cultures depends on how they have deviated from natural life. It includes the difference in habitat, talking, food habit, free time habits, life management, and management of emotions.
GOD AND SPIRITS:
How is God? This question is answered in several different ways, according to different beliefs. Though we have not seen Him, we believe Him. It’s the belief that makes us comfortable, particularly in difficult situations. This example may ease definition of God. God is helping. Whatever helps in our life, we never call it God. But we ask God to help. So, God is complementary of what supports us directly. Or, we dont want to define God within any limits. When we see something, which exhibits a characteristic of God, we define it. So, it will sieze to be a part of God. Finally, we dont want to define God, probably because, we dont want to loose belief in unbound capacity of God.
What about spirits and life after death? First we need to define life before death. Presently, I will take your excuse and write it in next posts.
Having answered some questions of my earlier post, I would like to answer an obvious question of yours. After discussing about all these things what are we heading towards? Are we going for some conclusion? Answer is yes, but I don’t want to fill you with the conclusion now only. I want the readers to be unbiased, give objective feedbacks until the end. Let me finish today’s post with this. I will come again. Bye.
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Unseen and Unknown
After a long time I am thinking of putting my thoughts on to paper. I will try to describe how the present world that I have seen, doesn’t fit to my logic, also try to put my thoughts on whatever which is logical as per me. This may not be always practical. In those cases I am expecting a change in the present society for making them practical. Many times, my thoughts are simply questions as to 'why we are here like this'. Just wanting logical and neatly defined answers. I am writing all these for validations as Prem says.
The first thing I would like to point on is our perception of what is unseen and unknown.
UNIVERSE:
We think about universe. What is there in universe, which is outside the world of our reach? To the maximum what is our reach now? Have set foot on moon or have we? There is a question mark that ‘have we’? NASA should give an answer. This is a question in minds of several million people I suppose by now.
Coming back to the point, what is our perception of anything outside the world of our reach? And why is that perception so? How have we concluded on that? What we think about possibilities of our reach to the total knowledge about universe? I.e. 'How much can we ever know about universe through science and technology?' I am not questioning as an argument against science etc. Just want an objective and logically acceptable answer.
Let me put all these in this way, in totality, what we know about universe presently I think is too minimal. And also if we think about whatever we say we know about, just observe the way concepts are changing. E.g. Concept about black holes etc… the things we have decided about them has been changing for such a large extent. Can anybody say, can we ever come to a right conclusion about anything of universe outside our reach? Is there any limit for thirst towards, this way of gaining knowledge, a rigorous scientific research? To the maximum, this way would satisfy the pride hungry people, I feel, to say, they have revealed this and getting Nobel prizes.
So, just wanted to ask this question. Are we heading in right direction of persuasion? Where is the end for such a persuasion? Is there any way to know whole universe around you? Is it possible in a life time to anybody to know the whole? Where will this persuasion lead to? We are looking forward for any alien world with life? If we get to them, what we will do? I don’t think, that would be a great happiness for those aliens. What is the intention of contacting them? I don’t think we can ever be sure of that.
We don’t know what it is exactly there outside out limits, try to define and redefine. They say this is thirst to knowledge. And justify that this would help our future generations. But, how? What we need to provide for future generations, so that they will be happy?
We are talking about unknown and unseen world, of outside our reach. There are still other unseen things within a life span of us. What are they?
OTHER CULTURES:
There are so many openions about defference of culture. What we presume about other cultures? What we are thinking about them who live with a different culture? How different are they? Let us observe about a single culture also. How similar are people belonging to a single culture among themselves? Just wanted to ask something about cultural change also. Why do people of one culture start migrating to any other culture? What makes them do so? Or what makes people in one culture remain in the same though they see outside culture also? However we are deviating from topic again.
Let me return, we were talking about culture, unknown and unseen ones. We presume so many things when we get to know it for first time. How would be daily habit of each living in that cult, in different stages of life? How their childhood, youth and post marital life would be? What are its superstitions? (I don’t think any culture is there without superstitions, it’s just a matter of way of putting their logic in deciding their lifestyle. Something is superstitious until it fits into your logic.) What they believe and what not? It’s not until we live in that cult that, we know exactly, how we have been different that people of our original cult. How can we be absolute in saying what a right lifestyle is and what not?
GOD AND SPIRIT:
Almost all see how people believe in God. But, God, we have not seen Him. What are our imaginations about Him? He knows everything, can do everything. He can see everything. He is present everywhere. Within and surrounding of us. But are they true? Science can prove His existance? Or is it better to ask, is science advanced enough to prove His existance? Many times, I feel, God concept is created out of fear of death (whatever, it has been good for human race to believe in God, as God cannot be unjust and it is a source of keeping morality in people, though there were few exceptions).
God concept also accompanies, another thing, life after death. These are speculations like what would be the fate after death? Also the concept of Hell and Heaven comes into picture. No one who would have seen has returned. Or the narrations which have been told about visiting them have not been proved. Concept of spirits, haunting dearly places. Nothing has been known completely. Anybody, who has started preaching about them, has been able to attract many people. We hear about spirits and fear, hope that it won’t be our own experience one day. But, never think how it is possible, if it is there.
I think I will finish today with this much. I just wanted to be thought provoking rather than giving my own answers right now. So, it might seem to be a collection of questions than anything. I will try putting my answers, the answers I assumed (for the time being), in my future posts. Till then, Good bye readers.
The first thing I would like to point on is our perception of what is unseen and unknown.
UNIVERSE:
We think about universe. What is there in universe, which is outside the world of our reach? To the maximum what is our reach now? Have set foot on moon or have we? There is a question mark that ‘have we’? NASA should give an answer. This is a question in minds of several million people I suppose by now.
Coming back to the point, what is our perception of anything outside the world of our reach? And why is that perception so? How have we concluded on that? What we think about possibilities of our reach to the total knowledge about universe? I.e. 'How much can we ever know about universe through science and technology?' I am not questioning as an argument against science etc. Just want an objective and logically acceptable answer.
Let me put all these in this way, in totality, what we know about universe presently I think is too minimal. And also if we think about whatever we say we know about, just observe the way concepts are changing. E.g. Concept about black holes etc… the things we have decided about them has been changing for such a large extent. Can anybody say, can we ever come to a right conclusion about anything of universe outside our reach? Is there any limit for thirst towards, this way of gaining knowledge, a rigorous scientific research? To the maximum, this way would satisfy the pride hungry people, I feel, to say, they have revealed this and getting Nobel prizes.
So, just wanted to ask this question. Are we heading in right direction of persuasion? Where is the end for such a persuasion? Is there any way to know whole universe around you? Is it possible in a life time to anybody to know the whole? Where will this persuasion lead to? We are looking forward for any alien world with life? If we get to them, what we will do? I don’t think, that would be a great happiness for those aliens. What is the intention of contacting them? I don’t think we can ever be sure of that.
We don’t know what it is exactly there outside out limits, try to define and redefine. They say this is thirst to knowledge. And justify that this would help our future generations. But, how? What we need to provide for future generations, so that they will be happy?
We are talking about unknown and unseen world, of outside our reach. There are still other unseen things within a life span of us. What are they?
OTHER CULTURES:
There are so many openions about defference of culture. What we presume about other cultures? What we are thinking about them who live with a different culture? How different are they? Let us observe about a single culture also. How similar are people belonging to a single culture among themselves? Just wanted to ask something about cultural change also. Why do people of one culture start migrating to any other culture? What makes them do so? Or what makes people in one culture remain in the same though they see outside culture also? However we are deviating from topic again.
Let me return, we were talking about culture, unknown and unseen ones. We presume so many things when we get to know it for first time. How would be daily habit of each living in that cult, in different stages of life? How their childhood, youth and post marital life would be? What are its superstitions? (I don’t think any culture is there without superstitions, it’s just a matter of way of putting their logic in deciding their lifestyle. Something is superstitious until it fits into your logic.) What they believe and what not? It’s not until we live in that cult that, we know exactly, how we have been different that people of our original cult. How can we be absolute in saying what a right lifestyle is and what not?
GOD AND SPIRIT:
Almost all see how people believe in God. But, God, we have not seen Him. What are our imaginations about Him? He knows everything, can do everything. He can see everything. He is present everywhere. Within and surrounding of us. But are they true? Science can prove His existance? Or is it better to ask, is science advanced enough to prove His existance? Many times, I feel, God concept is created out of fear of death (whatever, it has been good for human race to believe in God, as God cannot be unjust and it is a source of keeping morality in people, though there were few exceptions).
God concept also accompanies, another thing, life after death. These are speculations like what would be the fate after death? Also the concept of Hell and Heaven comes into picture. No one who would have seen has returned. Or the narrations which have been told about visiting them have not been proved. Concept of spirits, haunting dearly places. Nothing has been known completely. Anybody, who has started preaching about them, has been able to attract many people. We hear about spirits and fear, hope that it won’t be our own experience one day. But, never think how it is possible, if it is there.
I think I will finish today with this much. I just wanted to be thought provoking rather than giving my own answers right now. So, it might seem to be a collection of questions than anything. I will try putting my answers, the answers I assumed (for the time being), in my future posts. Till then, Good bye readers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
